2nd December 2007

Philip Booth writes to the Local Government Association magazine sent to all councillors in response to a letter re 20 mph

Cllr Peter Horton mistakenly claims there is not a case for 20 mph throughout our towns and cities (1st December 2007: issue 362). He sites emissions being higher at lower speeds due to more gear changes. In fact there is evidence that 20 mph can lead to better flows of traffic, less congestion, less noise and less emissions. However most importantly research shows 20 mph are a critical success factor in promoting walking, cycling and public transport as alternatives to the private car.

If we are to tackle climate change on our roads then 20 mph is crucial. 20 mph help create 'living streets' as is the speed at which pedestrians feel more confident about crossing roads, children play more outside and it is quiet enough to hold a conversation.

Of course we also know the statistics showing a pedestrian hit by a car at 40 mph only has a 15% chance of surviving, at 30mph, 55%, but at 20mph the chance of survival increases to 95%. How can we justify anything other than 20 mph on these grounds alone?

Britain's record for child safety is the worst in Europe. Hull and Portsmouth are leading the way on 20 mph. We are long overdue the time when all our all towns and villages are automatically 20 mph.

Cllr Philip Booth (Green party) Stroud District Council