|
If Tesco and Wal-Mart are friends of the earth, are there any enemies left? |
|
|
|
The superstores compete to
convince us they are greener than their rivals, but they are locked
into unsustainable growth.
Read Monbiot article here.
Excerpt:
So,
perhaps, is the sheer scale of the business. Wal-Mart and Tesco can
change the world at the stroke of a pen, but one decision they will not
make voluntarily is to relax their grip on local economies. It will
always be harder for small businesses to work with a global behemoth
than with the local baker or butcher; Tesco's economy will continue to
favour the big, distant supplier over the man down the road. And what
of the sense of community that independent small shops help to foster,
which encourages people to make their friends close to home? If love
miles are the most intractable cause of climate change, we need to
start cultivating as much community spirit as we can.
But there is a bigger contradiction than this, which has been
overlooked by the supermarkets and by many of their critics. "The green
movement," Leahy tells us, "must become a mass movement in green
consumption." But what about consuming less? Less is the one thing the
superstores cannot sell us. As further efficiencies become harder to
extract, their growth will eventually outstrip all their reductions in
the use of energy. This is not Tesco's problem alone: the green
movement's alternatives still lack force.
The big retailers are competing to convince us that they are greener
than their rivals, and this should make us glad. But we still need
governments, and we still need campaigners.
|