|
TWO LETTERS RESPONDING TO CRITICISMS RE CLIMATE CHANGE |
|
|
|
17th November 2006
Letter One
Julie
Yaisuwong (Letters 9.11.06) is perhaps right to take the Green Party to
task because we have written to The Echo so often about the greenhouse
gas emissions from cars and aircraft.
This has disguised the the fact that the Green Party espouses many
other policies like energy saving, shopping locally, being against the
privatisation in the NHS and opposition the the war in Iraq.
However Ms Yaisuwong does not tell us what is the source of her
figures. Mayer Hillman, at the 2004 Literature Festival,
explained that in the UK the proportion of energy use are as follows:
Transport 35%, Domestic 30%, Industry 22% and Services 13% (see his
book How We Can Save The Planet).
So transport is the biggest polluter, but our inefficient houses are
not far behind. Of the 17 million homes that have cavity walls,
only 6 million have been filled with insulation. And here are the
Department of Transport figures: excluding air and sea travel,
transport accounts for 22% of our CO2 emissions. Road travel
accounts for 91% and of this 87% is by car. According to the
transport minister, cars emit 7 and 8.5 times more CO2 per passenger
than trains and coaches respectively. Government projections are
for traffic to grow by 26% between 2000 and 2010.
The recent Stern report said that it would be better to invest now to
change our industrial and domestic lifestyles rather than wait until
the problem gets even worse. The Green Party accepts this
recommendation and is trying hard to convince the doubters that doing
nothing is not acceptable. The Tyndall Centre predicts that if we
achieve the government's own emission targets by 2050, then business
and the domestic sectors will have to emit no carbon at all, in order
to compensate for the growth in aviation.
John Heywood
Cheltenham Green Party
Letter two
Julie
Yaisuwongs' letter last week accused the Green party of "unfounded
hysterical language", "harrassing travelers" and making a "mockery of
reality" (9/11/06). Strong accusations indeed.
Yet the point we make about expansion of air travel including
Staverton, is sadly based in reality: it will just not be possible to
meet CO2 emissions targets if we expand air travel as proposed.
Clearly we also need international leadership on this issue and to
seriously look at how we can reduce energy consumption across the
board. The letter writer will be pleased to know that homes can be made
significantly more energy efficient and that she wont have to resort to
her suggestion of living in a tent.
However we should not forget that our current consumption and
production patterns is already losing peoples' homes and leading to
many deaths. It can only get worse. Thousands around the world are
already paying the price in famine and drought for our lifestyles in
the affluent West.
The newly announced Climate Change Bill fails to go far enough and
indeed completely fails to challenge our single-minded pursuit of
economic growth that will render us incapable of tackling climate
change. As Stern notes we only have a few years in which to act.
Stopping airport expansions is one step on many we must take.
Cllr. Philip Booth, Press Officer, Gloucestershire Green Party.
|